Solutions
Business Banking
Commercial Banking
Commercial Lending
Treasury Management
Company Retirement Plans
SBA Lending
Specialty Finance
Equipment Finance
Asset-Based Lending
Accounts Receivable Financing
Floorplan Financing
Private Wealth
Financial Planning
Investment Management
Trust & Estate Administration
Private Banking
Brokerage Services
Bank Consulting
Investment Portfolio Services
Asset Liability Management
ALM Process Validation
Resources
Resource Center
Events
Blog
Success Stories
Reports and Articles
Podcasts
About
Contact Us
Our Company
Community
People
Locations
News
Investors
Careers
Let's Talk
Login
Business
Online Business Banking
Remote Deposit
Business Credit Cards
Mobile Business Banking
Business Check Ordering
Remote Deposit – Demo
Factoring Client Login
Online Business Banking – Demo
Floorplan Client Login
Individual
Online Private Banking
Mobile Private Banking
Private Banking Credit Cards
Investment Portfolio, IRAS & Trust Accounts
Company Retirement Plans – Participant Login
Online Private Banking – Demo
SecurLOCK™ Equip
What are you looking for?
Search
Investor Relations
Corporate Overview
Corporate Profile
Officers & Directors
Corporate Governance
Corporate Structure
News & Presentations
Press Releases
Archived Earnings Release
Investor Presentations & Reports
Mergers & Acquisitions
Stock Information
Stock Chart & Other Information
Financial Calculators
Historic Prices
Stock Splits & Dividends
Covering Analysts
Insider SEC Filings
Insider Transactions
Institutional Ownership
Direct Stock Purchase Plan
Organization Actions Affecting Basis of Securities
Financial Information
SEC Filings
Financial Highlights
DL Composition Report
Peer Analysis
Investor Services
Email Notification
Information Request
FAQ
RSS Feeds
First Business Bank
Business Banking
Private Wealth
Bank Consulting
First Business Bank
Business Banking
Private Wealth
Bank Consulting
Search
Institutional Ownership
Ownership > 100%
Ownership > 100%
List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:
Double-counting
- On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.
Short Interest
- A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.
A gap between 'as of' dates
- In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.
Other possible reasons:
a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions;
b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues;
c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.